Advertisement

Thirty-Eight Who Saw Murder Didn't Call the Police Summary in Nepali and English And Question Answers | Mero Solution

Thirty-Eight Who Saw Murder Didn't Call the Police Summary And Question Answers

Thirty-Eight Who Saw Murder Didn't Call the Police Summary in English and Nepali And Question Answers

Summary of 'Thirty-Eight Who Saw Murder Didn't Call the Police' in English
                                             - Martin Gansberg

In the article "Thirty-Eight Who Saw Murder Didn't Call the Police," Martin Gansberg, a New York Times author, claims that society should be more involved in taking action when witnessing violent or life-threatening encounters between other people. He elaborates on this theme by providing a real homicide scenario that occurred as a short story. Martin Gansberg's purpose of writing this essay is to persuade readers in order to make changes in our society's mindset on public safety. His intended audience was towards anyone in general, especially to those who may witness violent disputes between other people.

Martin Gansberg wrote this essay mainly to persuade readers that our society should do more in protecting other citizens. He started his essay off by telling a story as a flashback of the encounter, then resuming the story. He strongly supports the fact that people should have taken immediate action when they witnessed the assailant's attempt to killing the victim. He also supports this claim by giving feedback from authoritative figures. He mentions detectives' feedback on the situation, stating that "A phone call would have done it". He also provides responses from many of the witnesses as they answer questions from detectives and police. He emphasized the fact that each one of the provided responses dealt with each of the witnesses not wanting to "get involved" with the situation. Gansberg did a very well job using his format of a short narrative based on a true event, then getting his thesis across from the murder case. He was very informative when providing the details and descriptions of what caused this tragic death of an innocent victim.
***********************************************************************
Summary of 'Thirty-Eight Who Saw Murder Didn't Call the Police' in Nepali

Summary of 'Thirty-Eight Who Saw Murder Didn't Call the Police' in Nepali


**********************************************************************
Question Answers of 'Thirty-Eight Who Saw Murder Didn't Call the Police'

A.Comprehension :

Q.1. According to Gansberg, how much time elapsed between the first stabbing of Kitty Genovese and the time when the people finally came out?

ANSWER : Approximately an hour and 5 minutes elapsed.

Q.2. What excuses do the neighbors make for not coming to Kitty Genovese's aid?

ANSWER : When asked why they didn't get call the police, the residents made excuses such as being tired, not wanting to get involved, or that they simply didn't know.

B.Purpose and Audience

Q.3. This article appeared in 1964. What effect was it intended to have on its audience? Do you think it has the same impact today, or has its impact changed or diminished?

ANSWER : This article was intended to urge people to call the police to help if they notice something wrong instead of deciding not to get involved or assuming that someone else would take care of it. The article remains impactful today; for many, especially those living in densely populated areas, hearing screams or shouting at night can become so common that residents may be inclined to ignore it. This article serves as a helpful reminder to stay vigilant and ready to help those who may need it.

Q.4. What is the article's main point? Why does Gansberg imply his thesis rather than state it explicitly?

ANSWER : Gansberg's main point is that the victim may have survived if the spectators had called the police or otherwise intervened. The thesis becomes clear throughout the article and can be easily implied without being explicitly stated. This is achieved by Ginsberg pointing out how the attack was carried out during three separate attacks, describing the lights of those watching scaring the assailant away, and including the interviews of the bystanders.

Q.5. What is Gansberg's purpose in describing the Austin Street area as "staid, Middle class, tree-lined?

ANSWER : Gansberg described the Austin Street area as "staid, middle-class, tree-lined" because he wants to point out this is a white town and neighbors maybe have a higher education but they did not call the police while the murder is happening.

Q.6. Why do you suppose Gansberg provides the police department's phone number in his article? (Note that New York City did not have 911 emergency service in 1964.)

ANSWER : Providing this number could be interpreted as a passive aggressive, sarcastic choice; it is clear from the included interviews that the bystanders had other reasons for not calling the police than simply not knowing how to reach them.
************************************************************************

Post a Comment

0 Comments