The Case Against Air Conditioning Summary(English/Nepali) And Question Answers

The Case Against Air Conditioning Summary And Question Answers

Contents :
1) Summary of The Case Against Air Conditioning in English
2) Summary of The Case Against Air Conditioning in Nepali
3) Question Answers of The Case Against Air Conditioning
3.1) Comprehensive Question Answers of The Case Against Air Conditioning
3.2) Style and Structure Question Answers of The Case Against Air Conditioning
Summary of The Case Against Air Conditioning in English
                                                                - Stan Cox

There are so many advantages and disadvantages of air condition. No air conditioning may put some more vulnerable citizens at risk during times when temperatures are rising. Citizens like the elderly, sick, and young children may not take likely to high temperatures considering the fact that they may be more fragile under those circumstances. Without AC, People would work little and have long holidays. Due to hot people would sleep day time. Job holder should not wear suit. Legislative body should not work in full time meaninglessly. With AC, people would invite tea party and think to make new government. Without AC, people would open the window and take fresh air. They would visit neighbour and exchange their personal feeling and ideas. Old people would also go outside and would not die without unnoticed. Children would come out and to take cold air, they would drive bike and scooter. To make environment cool, people would plant and environment becomes green and cool.
Summary of The Case Against Air Conditioning in Nepali

The Case Against Air Conditioning summary  in Nepali


Question Answers of The Case Against Air Conditioning

A. Comprehensive :

Q.1. What does Cox think is wrong with air conditioning?

ANSWER : Cox says that air conditioning uses a lot of energy; running air conditioners burns fossil fuels, which emits greenhouse gases that raise global temperatures, which in turn increases the need for air conditioning. He believes that air conditioning should be used more sparingly.

Q.2. According to Cox, what would be the results of a largely "A.C.-free Washington" (3)? Does the scenario he outlines apply only to Washington, DC? Only to urban areas? Does it apply to other parts of the country as well?

ANSWER : Cox says that reduced air conditioning use in Washington would result in more flexible work schedules (businesses, including governmental ones, closing and adjusting for heat), renovation for buildings to better accommodate heat, decreased use of heat generating appliances, and increased socialization resulting from time outside. These changes could apply to other towns and cities across the country as well.

Q.3. Beginning in paragraph 4, Cox discusses the positive effects of reducing the use of air conditioning. What negative effects does he ignore?

ANSWER : Reducing air conditioning use could be difficult for people who do not tolerate heat well; they may feel as if they are confined to spaces that have air conditioning and have difficulty functioning during the summer. This could also pose problems for pets who are intolerant to heat.

Q.4. Aside from "hospitals, archives, and cooling centers for those who are vulnerable to heat" (3), what other facilities and groups do you think need air conditioning?

ANSWER : Grocery stores, pet stores, animal shelters, care facilities, factories, and gyms would all need air conditioning. People who are sensitive to heat, such as the elderly, those with disabilities, and young children should be able to use air conditioning freely as well.

Q.5. What does Cox mean in paragraph 5 when he says that the end of air conditioning will bring paperweights back to American offices?

ANSWER : Without air conditioning, people would make use of alternative cooling devices, like fans. Since fans create an air current, people would need to begin using paperweights to keep their papers from blowing off their desks.

B. Style and structure :

Q.6. Does this essay focus on causes or on effects? What specific words does Cox use to indicate this focus?

ANSWER : This essay focuses on the effects of reducing air conditioning usage. The focus on effects is indicated by phrases like "In a world without air conditioning" "with the right to open a window," "With more people spending more time outdoors," and "because of the cooling effect".

Q 7. Evaluate the effectiveness of Cox's one-sentence conclusion. Does it make sense to close the essay this way? Is it consistent in tone and content with the discussion that precedes it?

ANSWER : Cox's closing statement was intended to reinforce his idea that reducing air conditioning use would lead to more time outside as well as a more environmentally-friendly world; he is imagining the very consumerist-oriented environment of the mall being replaced by a nature reserve.

This statement is consistent with the rest of his essay, which imagines an alternate reality where such changes are widespread. His use of this statement as a conclusion is an effective choice because it serves as a symbol for the rest of his ideas.

Post a Comment